> Am 25.01.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > > >> On 25 Jan 2017, at 12:04, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dionisi...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> 2017-01-25 12:03 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dionisi...@gmail.com>>: >> I think problem that these names could be already in use by frameworks. I am >> sure #isReadOnly, #beReadOnly is used in many UI's. For example Margitte >> uses it >> >> And probably Glorp > > > yes, but #setIsReadOnlyObject: deserves a place in the podium of ugly names :) > Absolutely. And we are a really caring community because we care so much about a method name of a feature that does not work :)
Norbert > I thought the names were going to be like beWritable/beNotWritable/isWritable > which are not a lot better, but well… > > Esteban
