Cool :) I forgot this one !
Guile, what is its status ? Can you give some information (the web site is in latin ;) ) I’ll try it. Cheers, Cédrick > Le 27 mai 2020 à 14:00, serge.stinckw...@gmail.com a écrit : > > There is already a static website generator in Pharo: > https://github.com/guillep/ecstatic <https://github.com/guillep/ecstatic> > Maybe you should start from that? > It would be great. > Regards > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 27 May 2020, at 19:49, Esteban Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:59 AM Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Hi - a bit late to reply on this one, but I did try Jekyl years ago, it >>>> was ok but over time frustrating to use and difficult to make the pipeline >>>> understandable ... >>>> I looked at Hugo and a few others but ended up going with Metalsmith (a JS >>>> static generator). I liked the plugable pipeline model of it, but cursed >>>> the state of Js tools (a few years ago) . >>> It seems indeed that Jekyll can become frustrating. I’m using Hugo right >>> now. I didn’t know metalsmith... >> >> I tried Jekyll and Gatsby.js, and albeit the latest is a mix of SSR >> and SPA, I found some of their ideas in how to organize content to be >> valuable, but I can't stand the tooling or the feeling of facing an >> unneeded accidental complexity. >> >>>> I’ve been meaning for ages to reimplement it in Smalltalk with a nice oo >>>> composite pipeline model and an easy way to debug and visualise what is >>>> going when getting your template right. >>> I’ve tried to restrain myself not to redo it in smalltalk but that would be >>> great option. I don’t know the required effort though but I’ll be glad to >>> be part of such project. >> >> I spent the last weekend giving a try to that Gatbsy thing (nuxt.js >> and vuepress are in the backlog too), and at 10PM on sunday I decided >> to start coding something in Smalltalk, because it just feels better >> to me. >> >> I don't know how harder would it be, but that's a tool we currently >> lack, the static-site generator. And we have support for different >> templating, rendering canvas, and whatnot. >> >>>> Combine this with the new headless image and it should easily plug into >>>> netlify . >>> Plus to netlify but also class export to servers. I thing Git(hubs) Pages >>> are a nice option. In any cas, one nice pattern is to use git to store >>> pages versions, and then you can replay on Pages / or on your own server / >>> or on netlify. >> >> When I think about netlify I don't think about an app (as in, an >> executable) but as a simple static site, but if it possible to deploy >> an app that is distributed and served by their CDN, then better! >> >>> I also wonder what would be possible with mini-image like Erik did. >> >> I need to see more! >> I don't know how independent a client image can be, how much you can >> "pre-deploy" without needed to rehydrate the browser with server >> changes, etc. >> It's promising. >> >> Regards! >>
