> > Guile, what is its status ? Can you give some information (the web site is in > latin ;) )
Ok I didn’t see the menu and was hitting (on phone) http://guillep.github.io/ecstatic/getting_started.html <http://guillep.github.io/ecstatic/getting_started.html> (you should remove this link ;-) ). http://guillep.github.io/ecstatic/install.html <http://guillep.github.io/ecstatic/install.html> http://guillep.github.io/ecstatic/first_site.html <http://guillep.github.io/ecstatic/first_site.html> I’ll try soon. Are partials possibles ? I guess I have to look at the code … Cheers, Cédrick > > I’ll try it. > > Cheers, > Cédrick > >> Le 27 mai 2020 à 14:00, serge.stinckw...@gmail.com >> <mailto:serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> There is already a static website generator in Pharo: >> https://github.com/guillep/ecstatic <https://github.com/guillep/ecstatic> >> Maybe you should start from that? >> It would be great. >> Regards >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 27 May 2020, at 19:49, Esteban Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:emaring...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:59 AM Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:cdric...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>>> Hi - a bit late to reply on this one, but I did try Jekyl years ago, it >>>>> was ok but over time frustrating to use and difficult to make the >>>>> pipeline understandable ... >>>>> I looked at Hugo and a few others but ended up going with Metalsmith (a >>>>> JS static generator). I liked the plugable pipeline model of it, but >>>>> cursed the state of Js tools (a few years ago) . >>>> It seems indeed that Jekyll can become frustrating. I’m using Hugo right >>>> now. I didn’t know metalsmith... >>> >>> I tried Jekyll and Gatsby.js, and albeit the latest is a mix of SSR >>> and SPA, I found some of their ideas in how to organize content to be >>> valuable, but I can't stand the tooling or the feeling of facing an >>> unneeded accidental complexity. >>> >>>>> I’ve been meaning for ages to reimplement it in Smalltalk with a nice oo >>>>> composite pipeline model and an easy way to debug and visualise what is >>>>> going when getting your template right. >>>> I’ve tried to restrain myself not to redo it in smalltalk but that would >>>> be great option. I don’t know the required effort though but I’ll be glad >>>> to be part of such project. >>> >>> I spent the last weekend giving a try to that Gatbsy thing (nuxt.js >>> and vuepress are in the backlog too), and at 10PM on sunday I decided >>> to start coding something in Smalltalk, because it just feels better >>> to me. >>> >>> I don't know how harder would it be, but that's a tool we currently >>> lack, the static-site generator. And we have support for different >>> templating, rendering canvas, and whatnot. >>> >>>>> Combine this with the new headless image and it should easily plug into >>>>> netlify . >>>> Plus to netlify but also class export to servers. I thing Git(hubs) Pages >>>> are a nice option. In any cas, one nice pattern is to use git to store >>>> pages versions, and then you can replay on Pages / or on your own server / >>>> or on netlify. >>> >>> When I think about netlify I don't think about an app (as in, an >>> executable) but as a simple static site, but if it possible to deploy >>> an app that is distributed and served by their CDN, then better! >>> >>>> I also wonder what would be possible with mini-image like Erik did. >>> >>> I need to see more! >>> I don't know how independent a client image can be, how much you can >>> "pre-deploy" without needed to rehydrate the browser with server >>> changes, etc. >>> It's promising. >>> >>> Regards! >>> >
