Mariano wrote: >So...if you take a Core 11367 and load the metacellol version, it will >work perfect.
But wouldn't that mean we should have a "1.1-beta1.11367" in the config? >That's not broken. Yes, the '1.1-beta1.10517' still works with the core 11367 image. But if you update it to a Core 11372 first and then use the ConfigurationOfPharo (1.1-beta1.10517) it is broken. >How can you assure that for any core version the same metacello version can >work on it? That's impossible. Yes. So the question is which core image is the base for Pharo 1.1. (10517, 11367, ...)? I would do: - a feature freeze for the core or pick a stable core so we have a stable 1.1 base to build the dev-image upon - adopt the config and loaded packages until they work on this core - test, test, test >I can update it, but if noone fixes Nile... I think the Nile problem is related to the traits problem introduced between core 11367 and core 11372. Since Stef already found the problem I asked if we get a fix in an upcoming 11373 so building the dev-image may work again. So currently we dont have a broken configuration but a broken core. Bye T. -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
