2010/12/9 Levente Uzonyi <le...@elte.hu>: > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> BTW >> when giving feedback consider that the guy doing that is spending a lot of >> time and this will be his master >> and that the code was not optimize and that there is no dedicated >> primitive in play. >> >> So we will see at the end and I was thinking that our little community >> would be much more positive but >> we will continue because we believe that there is some value in that. > > Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Fuel is not useful. I'm saying that > improving code loading performance is not that important. >
Sort of. But what is most important, i think that you can exchange objects between images. MC really allows you to exchange only with source code, while with Fuel, i think you could put any object/data into binary package, and don't bother with inventing the pervasive ways how to recreate complex (or big) data structures from array literals :) Another interesting aspect of binary format is that you can give binary to people without disclosing source code.. (waving to corporate world ;) > > Levente > >> >> Stef > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
