I'm not even close to being a smalltalk wizard, so I can't really answer
your questions. However, you should probably read "Pharo by example" (
http://pharobyexample.org/). AFAIK it is one of the best books for newbies
like me and it has a nice chapter about Morphic that should get you started.

Also, you should probably look at Polymorph as well:
http://www.pharocasts.com/search/label/gui.

Cheers,
Richo

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Daniel Lyons <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have two questions, a technical one and a more general one.
>
> In broad strokes, what are people doing for GUIs? My guess would be using
> Morphic, but googling around you find more abuse than use, it looks like,
> and very little live links to up-to-date documentation. It makes me wonder:
> is there something other than Morphic which is being used? Or is everyone
> doing web apps? Or is there some other GUI toolkit I haven't found yet, and
> that's where all the action is? Whenever I see a neat Morphic window or
> something, I feel a bit like there's a party going on somewhere and I didn't
> get an invitation. Like the first rule of Morphic club is you don't talk
> about Morphic club.
>
> The general question I have is basically, am I the problem? Is it that the
> documentation isn't where I expect to find it, or in the form I'm used to
> seeing, or that it isn't relevant somehow in the Smalltalk universe? Or is
> it all really intuitive except for me? :) I could accept that, I suppose,
> but how did you Smalltalk wizards become wizards? Did you just dive in and
> start reading the code in your own image? Was there some master Smalltalk
> wizard that you knew who showed you how to do these things? I'm currently
> reading Smalltalk Best Practice Patterns and it's one of the best
> programming books I've ever read. I see that there is a great deal of
> mastery of programming going around in Smalltalk circles, but I don't see
> the books that take you past beginner towards master, other than SBPP. So
> what's the trick going on here? How did you guys become excellent?
>
> I hope none of this comes across as negative; I think surely it's that I'm
> missing something.
>
> Thanks,
>
> —
> Daniel Lyons
>
>
>

Reply via email to