On 25 March 2011 12:35, Stefan Marr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi: > > On 25 Mar 2011, at 11:01, Toon Verwaest wrote: > >> If you really win a lot of performance by doing so, this is justified >> (although I would still give it a different class than just Array ;)). I'm >> just trying to find out if that performance boost is really there. But I'm >> going to take this offline I think not to pollute the whole mailing list >> with our circular conversations, and I'll report back if we figure something >> interesting out ;) > Well, for what it is worth, I really enjoy such discussions. And they are > much more than all the usual ones here on the list ;) > > If you do not feel that the Pharo mailing list is the right place, there is > always an almost unused smalltalk research mailing list... > No, it is right place for such discussions. Come on, since when extra mail traffic in Pharo list became a problem? :)
For people who interested in topic (like me), they can read and learn something new (and put their ignorant 2cents ;) . And if you do it privately, then we will have just two people who know how closures are implemented instead of 10 or 20 ones. > Best regards > Stefan > > > -- > Stefan Marr > Software Languages Lab > Vrije Universiteit Brussel > Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium > http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr > Phone: +32 2 629 2974 > Fax: +32 2 629 3525 > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
