El vie, 25-03-2011 a las 13:05 +0100, Henrik Johansen escribió: > On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:54 25PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > > > On 25 March 2011 12:35, Stefan Marr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi: > >> > >> On 25 Mar 2011, at 11:01, Toon Verwaest wrote: > >> > >>> If you really win a lot of performance by doing so, this is justified > >>> (although I would still give it a different class than just Array ;)). > >>> I'm just trying to find out if that performance boost is really there. > >>> But I'm going to take this offline I think not to pollute the whole > >>> mailing list with our circular conversations, and I'll report back if we > >>> figure something interesting out ;) > >> Well, for what it is worth, I really enjoy such discussions. And they are > >> much more than all the usual ones here on the list ;) > >> > >> If you do not feel that the Pharo mailing list is the right place, there > >> is always an almost unused smalltalk research mailing list... > >> > > No, it is right place for such discussions. > > Come on, since when extra mail traffic in Pharo list became a problem? :) > > Agreed. > Interesting technical discussion is much better than all of the "Cool!" and > "Me too!" posts we already get. (Which of course, ironically, this is one)
+100 ;) he he! -- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
