+1
> Hi:
>>
>> On 25 Mar 2011, at 11:01, Toon Verwaest wrote:
>>
>>> If you really win a lot of performance by doing so, this is justified
>>> (although I would still give it a different class than just Array ;)). I'm
>>> just trying to find out if that performance boost is really there. But I'm
>>> going to take this offline I think not to pollute the whole mailing list
>>> with our circular conversations, and I'll report back if we figure
>>> something interesting out ;)
>> Well, for what it is worth, I really enjoy such discussions. And they are
>> much more than all the usual ones here on the list ;)
>>
>> If you do not feel that the Pharo mailing list is the right place, there is
>> always an almost unused smalltalk research mailing list...
>>
> No, it is right place for such discussions.
> Come on, since when extra mail traffic in Pharo list became a problem? :)
>
> For people who interested in topic (like me), they can read and learn
> something new (and put their ignorant 2cents ;) .
> And if you do it privately, then we will have just two people who know
> how closures are implemented instead of 10 or 20 ones.
>
>
>> Best regards
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stefan Marr
>> Software Languages Lab
>> Vrije Universiteit Brussel
>> Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium
>> http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr
>> Phone: +32 2 629 2974
>> Fax: +32 2 629 3525
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
