I had a funny crash when I did 
        Editor := 'editor'
in a class using a sharedPool with a class variable named Editor
Now this is fixed in 1.4 but what we should do is to get the revert last accept 
in the emergency evaluator working again :)

Stef

On Nov 15, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote:

> I NEVER had an image crash, of course i'm not stating that it cant
> crash, but would be nice to know how many people have to deal with
> image crashes and how often.
> 
> Because, up to now, during my last 3 years of Pharo usage it never has
> been a big issue for me.
> 
> Fernando
> 
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Peter Hugosson-Miller
> <oldmanl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think the troll said he was leaving, so let's just all take a deep breath, 
>> be thankful for that, and move on.
>> 
>> Positive energy is what we need here, feeding trolls drains us more than one 
>> would think, so as far as possible we should just try and ignore them.
>> 
>> Carlo's answer was cool, too ;-)
>> 
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Igor Stasenko 
>> <siguc...@gmail.com<mailto:siguc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Currently, my Mac running 3 images. And it is hard to tell, but i
>> think one of them runs maybe more than month , without hangs, freezes
>> etc.
>> Now, why i should trust your words (not backed with anything serious)
>> that the software i use is unstable, when
>> i using it every day and it works well for me?
>> 
>> On 15 November 2011 12:18, Guido Stepken 
>> <gstep...@googlemail.com<mailto:gstep...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>> Ok, if it helps you to understand, that unstable software is quite useless 
>>> for anybody ... will do that!
>>> 
>>> Guido Stepken
>>> 
>>> Am 15.11.2011 um 12:05 schrieb Marcus Denker 
>>> <marcus.den...@inria.fr<mailto:marcus.den...@inria.fr>>:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 15, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Guido Stepken wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I think, programming, refactoring a peace of software has very much to do 
>>>>> with model theory, Löwenheim-Skolem theory (related to fixed point 
>>>>> theorem).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Good programmers migrate code, addon's from one stable, consistent state 
>>>>> to the other. These "stable states" are expressed in release numbers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What are you doing? Don't know!
>>>> 
>>>> So why don't you then just unsubscribe from the mailinglist?
>>>> 
>>>> We clearly are not up to your standards. And this will not change.
>>>> 
>>>> I think there is no way that we can work constructively together, so the 
>>>> best for all is that you just go away.
>>>> and everyone is happy. (you, too!)
>>>> 
>>>> You can refactor according to Skolem, we refactor how we like it, and 
>>>> everyone is happy.
>>>> 
>>>>    Marcus
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko.
>> 
> 


Reply via email to