On 31 January 2012 15:59, Otto Behrens <o...@finworks.biz> wrote: > I was wondering more if it is possible to do without having a file > system checkout of the class definition. In other words, if the class > definition in the image could serve as the working copy of the object > in the git repository. I must read more on what the other guys did > with the git interfaces (such as gitfs and gitosis) to understand what > it comes down to. > > If this is possible, it would make merging, loading and committing > essentially one step.
Have you seen what Camillo did? http://www.squeaksource.com/FSGit https://github.com/dh83/fs-git-test Note the layout with class comment in a README file, etc :) There is a also nearly working implementation of the git network protocol (stubbed using the git binaries ATM). > The disadvantage could be a tight coupling with git. is that really a disadvantage, compared to a tight coupling with monticello? -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
