what ? since when morphic is the future of "others" ? I am confused, does not Pharo use morphic ? Does not Pharo care for mophic ?
I am new with Pharo but I have not seen any other GUI than Morphic , distributed as standard by Pharo unless I am missing something here ? Am I ? ________________________________ From: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr; lengli...@cox.net Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012, 19:03 Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] keeping up with lively-kernel (morphic) On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Lawson English wrote: > Does Pharo use Morphic? Is there a conscious decision on people's parts to > NOT try and keep the various flavors of Morphic compatible, or is it just > "too hard," or that people don't care, or think it irrelevant? > > Some graphical frameworks manage to keep a centralized core of classes > because they are created by one group of people for one language and then > bindings ported to other languages. Morphic is unique in that it is being > [re]implemented in 3 different languages: Self, Smalltalk (with several > variations within that branch) and JavaScript. Is there any way, or even > desire, to coordinate between the differing versions? are you serious? Please can we continue to build our future instead of talking about the one of others? Stef
