On Feb 2, 2012, at 7:16 PM, dimitris chloupis wrote: > curious , do you basically say that Pharo community searches for a way to get > rid and replace Morphic in Pharo ?
improve it or replace it if someone propose something better :). Stef > > > > From: Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> > To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr; lengli...@cox.net > Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012, 20:00 > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] keeping up with lively-kernel (morphic) > > > On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Lawson English wrote: > > > My understanding is that one of the design-specs of Lively Kernel Morph was > > to allow easy porting of the original Smalltalk-based Morphs to LK. > > If they did that, they did a mistake. Do you really want to be compatible to > Squeak Morphic? To that mess? > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > > >
