I apparently misread some of the papers. I can't find mention of how
Morphic was ported, though the ability to use smalltalk inside an LK
morph suggests that there is some expectation of reuse of code or
perhaps they simply wanted Smalltalk programmers to feel more
comfortable with LK morphs from the start.
L.
On 2/2/12 11:00 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Lawson English wrote:
My understanding is that one of the design-specs of Lively Kernel Morph was to
allow easy porting of the original Smalltalk-based Morphs to LK.
If they did that, they did a mistake. Do you really want to be compatible to
Squeak Morphic? To that mess?
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
