I meant: Example of 1) is you loading OmniBrowser or Nautilus. Example of 2) is your project using a specific version of XmlSupport or seaside. Example of 3) is the ImageBuilder of Mariano, which loads a lot of stuff to build a Development image.
:P On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com > wrote: > Wat? Probably there was a misunderstood... > > 1) if you are an user of the project, stable should be enough and fine. > 2) if your project is coupled to the project, probably you are coupled to > an specific version. Thus, in your configuration you better put the > specific number :). > 3) if your project is not coupled to the project, just inteded to load it, > using stable should be enough and fine. > > Example of 1) is you loading OmniBrowser or Nautilus. > Example of 2) is your project using a specific version of XmlSupport or > seaside. > Example of 3) is the ImageBuilder of Mariano, which loads a lot of stuff > to build a Development image. > > Guille > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K > <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu>wrote: > >> Put another way, if it's that simple, why all the contrary instructions >> over time? >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [ >> pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Camillo Bruni [ >> camillobr...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:40 PM >> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration >> browser more visible? >> >> On 2012-04-27, at 01:17, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: >> >> > Can they really download stuff? How much? Until the configurations >> are truly self-describing and "know" what to use for which version of >> Pharo[*], the Config Browser is really (sorry guys) a very clear >> illustration of what we have yet to do in the way of packaging. >> > >> > Bill >> > >> > [*] there needs to be one incantation that works to load everything, >> something like #loadStable. Then a config browser can work as advertised, >> and I fear, not until. Prove me wrong :) >> >> seems like you missed something (Metacello Configurations)? it's done >> like this in st-code: >> >> ConfigurationOfXYZ project load: #stable >> >> >> > ________________________________________ >> > From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [ >> pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Stéphane >> Ducasse [stephane.duca...@inria.fr] >> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:17 PM >> > To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration >> browser more visible? >> > >> > Ok for me. >> > Package Maps Loader >> > >> > Stef >> > >> >> What about naming it "Package Loader" or "Package center" or something >> like that? >> >> And putting it in the main menu instead of inside of Tools? >> >> >> >> I want people who open pharo for the first time to say "Hey, here I >> can download stuff!!!" >> >> >> >> Guille >> >> >> >
