On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu>wrote:
> It's nice that there are examples that work, but the vast majority of > configs are not so well organized. > I'm not the mantainer of the majority of configs so I do not know. What I explained before is how they are supposed to work and be managed. If the person who mantains the config does not ensure you that, It's not the problem of the configuration :). Now, if there are configs not working as expected, it would be good to: - know them - tell the mantainers - try to fix one? - not yelling in general because that does not work :S. >From my side, this week I fixed the configurations of: - Glamour - OpenDBXDriver - Glorp + GlorpDBX - ScriptManager so they can load in latest 1.4. But I can't be everywhere yet :P. Also, 1.4 is has just been released, so I expect most users are moving their stuff soon. Cheers, Guille > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [ > pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Guillermo > Polito [guillermopol...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 27, 2012 12:26 PM > > *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration > browser more visible? > > I meant: > > Example of 1) is you loading OmniBrowser or Nautilus. > Example of 2) is your project using a specific version of XmlSupport or > seaside. > Example of 3) is the ImageBuilder of Mariano, which loads a lot of stuff > to build a Development image. > > :P > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Guillermo Polito < > guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Wat? Probably there was a misunderstood... >> >> 1) if you are an user of the project, stable should be enough and fine. >> 2) if your project is coupled to the project, probably you are coupled to >> an specific version. Thus, in your configuration you better put the >> specific number :). >> 3) if your project is not coupled to the project, just inteded to load >> it, using stable should be enough and fine. >> >> Example of 1) is you loading OmniBrowser or Nautilus. >> Example of 2) is your project using a specific version of XmlSupport or >> seaside. >> Example of 3) is the ImageBuilder of Mariano, which loads a lot of stuff >> to build a Development image. >> >> Guille >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K >> <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu>wrote: >> >>> Put another way, if it's that simple, why all the contrary instructions >>> over time? >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [ >>> pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Camillo Bruni >>> [camillobr...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:40 PM >>> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration >>> browser more visible? >>> >>> On 2012-04-27, at 01:17, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: >>> >>> > Can they really download stuff? How much? Until the configurations >>> are truly self-describing and "know" what to use for which version of >>> Pharo[*], the Config Browser is really (sorry guys) a very clear >>> illustration of what we have yet to do in the way of packaging. >>> > >>> > Bill >>> > >>> > [*] there needs to be one incantation that works to load everything, >>> something like #loadStable. Then a config browser can work as advertised, >>> and I fear, not until. Prove me wrong :) >>> >>> seems like you missed something (Metacello Configurations)? it's done >>> like this in st-code: >>> >>> ConfigurationOfXYZ project load: #stable >>> >>> >>> > ________________________________________ >>> > From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [ >>> pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Stéphane >>> Ducasse [stephane.duca...@inria.fr] >>> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:17 PM >>> > To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration >>> browser more visible? >>> > >>> > Ok for me. >>> > Package Maps Loader >>> > >>> > Stef >>> > >>> >> What about naming it "Package Loader" or "Package center" or >>> something like that? >>> >> And putting it in the main menu instead of inside of Tools? >>> >> >>> >> I want people who open pharo for the first time to say "Hey, here I >>> can download stuff!!!" >>> >> >>> >> Guille >>> >>> >>> >> >
