Hilaire Fernandes wrote > > To get the animation, you have to enclose the loop in a forked process, > but it is inelegant: > ... > [1 to: 300 do: [:x | > m extent: x@300. > (Delay forMilliseconds: 10) wait. > ]. > m delete] fork. >
Hilaire, why don't you like this? It seems very straightforward. You're doing a long-running operation and you want another thread to run concurrently. Fork seems like the natural choice. The only other issue is #addDeferredUIMessage: which Guille mentioned. I'm unclear exactly what kinds of Morphic interaction require it and haven't been able to get a clear answer. Your sample block doesn't seem to hurt morphic, but if you experience weirdness (like red X's), that's probably where to look. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Worskpace-question-tp4635656p4635943.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
