A few years back the interpreted virtual machine was fixed to allow an image to grow to the 4 GB limit. It is unclear to me if someone regressed the software to impose a 2GB limit again, or if the 2GB number mentioned is based on how things worked10 years ago?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>wrote: > > On Jul 31, 2012, at 11:46 PM, johnmci wrote: > > > David Lewis and I spent a far amount of time a few years back to make > the 32 > > vm 4gb clean. So are you running on stale knowledge here, or does the vm > > crash when to goes over 2gb? > > sorry my english limit does not let me know understanding what you mean > exactly. > Jannik in the context of moose would like to see if we can have image > larger than 500 mb (on mac it should be possible). > > Stef > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Memory-usage-tp4641108p4642349.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <john...@smalltalkconsulting.com> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com iPhone Apps. http://www.wikiserver.com Twitter: squeaker68882 ===========================================================================
