feldti wrote > > 0-based - because it's oriented towards C structures (and therefore > memory oriented). > ... > it's not an index, its an byte-offset from > the beginning of the memory.
I defer to those who have experience working in the C domain (not me for a long time, thank goodness). And, please if we decide to use 1-based, call it something other than index, which already has a meaning in our domain. Offset sounds good. - S -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-Question-zero-based-or-one-based-indexes-tp4645911p4645943.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
