On 26 February 2013 20:55, stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> wrote: > >> >> Oh, did you mean to type "you had no idea IF the package would load"? > > and work. > >> OK, sure, but that's not really SM's fault, that's just the way things >> were. >> >> Nowadays with CI and all sorts of stuff we're (Pharo _and_ Squeak, I >> mean) in a much better place. There's still the modularity aspect to >> worry about in the general case, but CI can still help out a bit >> there, flushing out incompatible monkey patches. > > If you want to use SqueakMap go ahead. I have been there and now I know > what I want for Pharo.
I never know what you mean when you say things like this. What is it that you want for Pharo? > Stef > >
