On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/3/11 Frank Shearar <frank.shea...@gmail.com> >> >> On 11 March 2013 13:34, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> i am very happy that github exists.. and its features available only if you >>> put code there.. >>> but if code is not on github, then what you will do? >> >> To rephrase the question: what do we still need to do before we can >> integrate (something like) github into a standard Smalltalk workflow? > > I totally agree on that. But Github is great if your project is open > source or you're willing to pay for private repos. > On the other hand, BitBucket.org has free private repositories. But it > doesn't have code review. > > In my case it is not a required feature, and I'd go for the already > implemented Github alternative. > > Every time I see smalltalkers forking away from established mainstream > solutions/practices I hear a big noise inside my head. On the > opposite, whenever I see stuff like the CI integrations, FileTree, > standards compliance, and so on, I'm really happy. Do you know when monticello was invented? and working for real? Stef
