On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 March 2013 17:54, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> pff... really people... i am thinking how to streamline our existing >> development process.. >> and instead i hear once again about git. > > Camillo needs to hit you around the head with a command line. But if igor would concentrate on the command line I would hit him with something else :) > You > haven't used it. You've heard several people who have used both > Monticello and git extensively say that git beats the crap out of > Monticello. Go and learn git properly. THEN come back and maybe we can > have a conversation. Frank, do not say that because you do not know that igor would love to use git to manage the VM code. So do not generalise, life is complex. >> okay, lets throw away MC & stuff, migrate everything on file-based >> file-per-method git repository >> and then navigate diffs on github, and trying to find senders or >> implementors of selector using web browser . > > I do believe you ought to take a moment and go read the archives. > Also, I happen to nearly violently disagree with the file-per-method > approach, but that's an entirely different kettle of fish. > > But you know what, just forget it. It's not your problem, other people > are already solving the problem, and one day hopefully you'll forget > all about this while quietly your tools happily use git under the > hood, where you neither know nor care. I'm waiting for this day :)
