oh, I'm here too, but that's because I have insomnia, not kids :)

On Apr 6, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Johan Brichau <jo...@inceptive.be> wrote:

> Indeed, I also increased the popup speed in the preferences to something like 
> 100 or 200ms.
> 
> But yes, you should wait for them to pop up.
> I did not address any other issues than the 'completion keystroke'.
> 
> btw, judging by the time of day, you can see who has small kids on this 
> mailing list :-)
> 
> On 06 Apr 2013, at 08:38, stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>> How can I get fast the choices?
>> Because when I type
>> 
>>      printO
>> 
>>      and press tab I do not get 
>> 
>>      printOn:
>>      but
>> 
>>      printO  |
>> Stef
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> fwiw, I changed the implementation of NECController to:
>>> - accept both <enter> and <tab> for code completion
>>> - still use <tab> to first complete the common prefixes, but a subsequent 
>>> <tab> will select the suggestion
>>> 
>>> i.e. this is the behavior in XCode, which imho is a very good one.
>>> 
>>> _and_ I do not have to disable the completion of common prefixes if I want 
>>> to disable <enter> for selection.
>>> 
>>> Maybe people should give this a try and see?
>>> 
>>> cheers
>>> Johan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <NECController-Changes.cs>
>>> 
>>> On 06 Apr 2013, at 02:18, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:57 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:19 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 3 April 2013 22:45, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> theres a setting to:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - disable ENTER to accept the completion
>>>>>>>> - to increase the popup delay
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> so I think that is invalid bug report then...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> i tend to disagree.
>>>>>>> The defaults which we have now in 2.0 for autocompletion
>>>>>>> is breaking my workflow badly too.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, i can go to settings and disable/reconfigure stuff but that doesn't
>>>>>>> nullifying the fact, that my workflow is broken with ambiguous and 
>>>>>>> inconsistent
>>>>>>> reaction(s) to my keystrokes by UI if i keep defaults.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> For instance i am still clueless, why 'enter' is default for 
>>>>>>> autocompletion,
>>>>>>> and disabling it and enabling 'tab' simply doesn't works.
>>>>>>> That leaves me with the only option: keep using 'enter' for
>>>>>>> autocompletion, if i ever want to use it.
>>>>>>> We have to fix that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2013-04-03, at 22:23, "Sean P. DeNigris" <s...@clipperadams.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> From
>>>>>>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10219/Completion-enter-on-accept-awkwardness
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The combination of enter on accept, with the current behavior to 
>>>>>>>>>> select
>>>>>>>>>> the first completion suggestion by default = trouble. For example:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Type "printOn: aStream"... pretty common method start
>>>>>>>>>> 2. Hit enter to go to the next line
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You will now have "printOn: MCDataStream" WTF!! I get burned by this
>>>>>>>>>> pretty regularly and it's annoying. I'm not sure what the fix should 
>>>>>>>>>> be...
>>>>>>>>>> probably no default selection in the suggestion menu, but possibly 
>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>> when enter on accept is enabled (t would require an extra key press 
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> complete and when do you ever type a tab in the middle of a line?)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> I haven't used the 2.0 auto compeltion yet so I don't know if this is 
>>>> relevant, but just a passing thought... When Microsoft Word muck up using 
>>>> smart characters, one small saving grace is that it first enters my 
>>>> original typing before "smart-ifying" it, such that ctrl-z undoes back to 
>>>> my original typing. 
>>>> 
>>>> cheers -ben
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to