I do not think that we want to have many extensions of the syntax.
We should enhance it but I do not see it changing and getting extended more.
Le 11/3/15 23:07, Tudor Girba a écrit :
I completely agree.
I think there are mostly pros. It can be that the parsing will be
slower, but I do not think this is a critical issue for Pillar. It
would be more important to have an extensible parser.
Cheers,
Doru
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Damien Cassou
<damien.cas...@gmail.com <mailto:damien.cas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
The current pillar parser has several problems:
- it is hard to understand and change
- it discards input locations
I think a refactor or rewrite is necessary. What are the pros and
cons of using PetitParser to do that?
Best
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
"Every thing has its own flow"
