> On Mar 28, 2015, at 08:06, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Le 28/3/15 08:53, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>> I think we have not yet any good API for this… one problem is that the 
>> .changes is not only a transaction log, but in addition
>> the place where the source of a method is stored.
>> 
>> I would like to
>> 
>> -> make transaction log + source storage independent.
>> -> add a kind of “virtual” package for these generated entities so that 
>> there is no package that gets dirty when generating code
>>     reflectively
>> -> have a good API so one can distinguishes “system notifications are send” 
>> from “change is logged” and “source is stored”.
> 
> + 1

+1 for that also. Priority for Pharo 5 ?


---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---

Johan Fabry   -   http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD lab  -  Computer Science Department (DCC)  -  University of Chile


Reply via email to