Hi! Any program on that front?
Alexandre > On Jul 23, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Jan Blizničenko <blizn...@fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > > As far as I looked, only two rounding methods are center and aboveCenter > (which has no senders in my image by the way and I do not even see purpose > of it)... all other (like leftCenter) are getting value from mentioned self > center. > > So, the easiest way seems to subclass Rectangle and make something like > Precise/Float/NotRounded/I'mNotVeryGoodAtNaming Rectangle > which will have just these two methods different, so there will be also this > PreciseRectangle which is not rounding down, but original one stays > unchanged. > > However, the rounding seems to me like an extension/addition/subtype of > general rectangle and I think that it should not be default behavior of > something called just Rectangle, it should be more like Rectangle (not > rounded) with subclass IntegerRectangle or something like that. I know, > there are many senders right now which are dependent on the rounding, but I > just think it should not be like that, or should it? > > Jan > > > abergel wrote >> Maybe we can introduce a new rectangle class. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Rectangle-center-rounding-tp4837980p4838853.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.