I just tried, looking for plugins you know. I get so impatient to get
all this to work. It takes lots of effrort. Thanks for the name check,
let's go for it!
robert
On 12/18/2015 11:45 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
At list it doesn't have a lot of hits:
https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=es&q=CryptoCeps#hl=es&q=CryptoCeps&nfpr=1
I think that the best thing is to come by the slack channel and talk
it in #random (now I'm almost slept). Trying a new name has a lot of
bouncing ideas in my experience, so real time communication is better
that mailing list (that's why I talk about it with friends over meal
or drinks).
Cheers,
Offray
On 18/12/15 22:37, Robert Withers wrote:
The Ode to CryptoCeps:
Bouncer: "No, I'm sorry. This is a restricted area..." *checks around
in case there's a problem*
Me: " 'cep I got this..." *hands over teensie tiny tasty little mushoom*
Note to self: 'did I eat one of those???' *can't seem to recall the
particular moment. Oh@*
Community: *looking sideways at each other* "What the hell is a
mushoom?"
Thank You! so much.
On 12/18/2015 10:27 PM, Robert Withers wrote:
Ah ha!!! Thank you...how about CryptOCeps? ;)
On 12/18/2015 10:22 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
Hi,
On the names side, I would advice some kind of unique combination,
for example "Jupyter notebook", works fine to find particularly
the project this community is trying to build. In my own case, I
spend a lot of time thinking in names and I discuss them with
friends with a drink or a meal. Despite of not having a strong web
presence in the sense of continuous updates in the web pages of my
projects (my main web page is still under construction!) they
position relatively well on google and DDG engines:
[1] https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=es&q=grafoscopio (5th link)
[2] https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=es&q=mutabit (1st link)
[3] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mutabit&t=ffsb (1st link)
[4] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=grafoscopio&t=ffsb (2nd link)
It didn't happen overnight but was a fluid organic process. So may
be "Mushroom crypto" or "Risotto crypto" could be important
descriptors in the main web presence sites of your projects (BTW, I
can't find the repos and GitHub answers with 404).
Cheers,
Offray
On 07/12/15 17:57, Robert Withers wrote:
Ben, Huw, Todd and Sven, thank you all for your feedback! I
suppose I could call the project "CryptOCaps" but for some reason
I glommed onto mushroom as the name. Not grandiose and it is
somewhat descriptive...a network of secure sessions, each one a
mushroom. Ceps are highly valued. We can tag it for the catalog.
For sure, we have Seaside, Morphic, Nebraska, Fuel, Alien, Cog,
Monticello and that's just the squeak side of unusual naming of
projects. I hope that "mushroom" gains a wide reputation as a
solid, reliable, secure and performant session layer under the
CryptOCaps presentation...I am thinking of splitting the secure
session layer from the ocaps presentation layer, but this would
require another name choice, so I hesitate...perhaps "Risotto"?
What are your thoughts?
Best,
Robert
On 12/07/2015 10:38 AM, Ben Coman wrote:
I like it, but it seems you missed my point :)
mushroom --> 117,000,000 is two orders of magnitude more hidden.
Anyway, maybe I overplay its significance.
cheers -ben
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Robert Withers
<robert.w.with...@gmail.com> wrote:
I renamed the project to Mushroom and I also dumped the encoding
work to
focus on shutdown, optimization and serialization. Here's the wiki:
https://github.com/SqueakCryptographySquad/Mushroom/wiki
thanks,Robert
On 12/06/2015 01:42 AM, Ben Coman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Robert Withers
<robert.w.with...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/05/2015 09:24 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Robert Withers
<robert.w.with...@gmail.com> wrote:
Now I think you are right on with your observation.
Additionally, the
number
of dialects could increase further with Fuel serialization,
just port
SecureSession and bits.
Alright, I came up with a name and it may border on the
egregious ...
presenting ...
"Maelstrom"
Great sounding name. However some general advice for the
community,
since I see a lot of great sounding project names drowned out
in the
noise of our web-search-centric universe. A litmus test for
project
naming is using google search to find which return low search
results.
Today, its more important to be unique than any other
attribute of a
name. So in general, *dictionary* english words are not the
best.
One technique is to intentionally mispell the word you like.
Here are
some comparative examples (note, the surrounding quotes are
required
to avoid google trying to be helpful and correct the
spelling)...
"maelstrom" --> 7,480,000
"maelstroom" --> 6,200
"maelstrum" --> 2,280
"maelstruum" --> 7
Lots of interesting other techniques can be found by
searching on:
techniques to generate brand names or domain names.
cheers -ben
I would be happy to change the names to something more unique,
though it
may
take a few. Are you suggesting "maelstruum"?
cheers,
Robert
*Suggesting* yes, but the choice is yours ;) You need to own it.
I think maelstruum is certainly memorable with the double "u", but
maybe jarring next the the "m". I'm inclined to maelstroom,
since I
associate it with "zoom". I wouldn't necessarily go for the
absolute
lowest results. I have an entirely unsubstantiated belief that
anything less than 10,000 gives a reasonable chance to compete
once a
user's browsing history is taken into account. Finally you need to
check existing results don't return something abhorrent (I
didn't do
this).
I'd encourage to play around testing on google search. Its
quick and
easy to generate and test alternatives. I've added a few more
below.
"maelstra" --> 3,560
"maelstram" --> 504
"maelstrim" --> 1200
"maelstroon" --> 58
"maelstroomi" --> 4
btw, I wouldn't swap the order of the "ae" since that would be
susceptible to real typing errors.
cheers -ben
--
. .. .. ^,^ robert
