Hi, I would very much like this path. What would constitute tiny?
Cheers, Doru > On Aug 11, 2017, at 9:10 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > >> On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:57, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Another step would be to get a minimal parser not relying on >> PetitParser. > > Let’s think differently: why not to include a tiny PetitParser? > Then we can think on: > > - pillar sintax (better than just a restricted version) > - simplify other “small parsers” that are already on the image. > - we provide a tool to o cool stuff (instead relying as always in regexp, > etc.) > > cheers, > Esteban -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Beauty is where we see it."
