Denis I agree. I do not like to code in reverse order.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-11-14 16:30 GMT+01:00 Steffen Märcker <merk...@web.de>: >> >> I forgot to mention, that the most recent code for Pharo is already on >> Github: https://github.com/Pharophile/Transducers >> >> Reducers was the name of the first very first implementation. >> >> (In fact, I was originally inspired by clojures Reducers lib. After >> implementing it in Smalltalk, I developed the concept further. Later I found >> out, that the clojure guys did the same in parallel and ended up with the >> same abstraction but a differnt name. Hence I decided change the name in >> order to make the relation clear.) > > > I like abstraction. But I think names and order of computation should be > changed to be more Smalltalk friendly. Because now it looks like Haskell > with right to left order: > > squares := Set <~ 1000 take <~ #squared map <~ (1 to: 1000). > fileOut writeStream <~ #isSeparator filter <~ fileIn readStream. > > > Is there any reason to not change it? I would like to start expressions with > source of data: > > squares := (1 to: 1000) ~> #squared map ~> 1000 take ~> Set. > fileIn readStream ~> #isSeparator filter ~> fileOut writeStream. > > > >> >> Am .11.2017, 16:18 Uhr, schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: >> >>> >>> >>>> On 14 Nov 2017, at 16:00, Steffen Märcker <merk...@web.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >> <---Schnitt---> >>>> >>>> >>>> No. Transducers is my side project. I've implemented a package for >>>> VisualWorks. Unfortunately, I did not finish the port to Pharo yet, simply >>>> due to a lack of time. Originally, transducers evolved in the clojure >>>> community. I figured, the concept a good fit for Smalltalk and adapted it >>>> accordingly. (My thesis is on conditional probabilities in model-checking >>>> of >>>> probabilistic systems.) >>>> >> <---Schnitt---> >> >>>> >>>> http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/publicRepository/Transducers.html >>>> https://clojure.org/reference/transducers >>>> Plus some mails on this list and more on the vwnc list. Feel free to >>>> ask; I understand, that the package comment has lots of potential for >>>> improvement to help understanding. >>>> >>>> Best, Steffen >>> >>> >>> Some code seems to be here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~cdlm/Experiments >>> >>> Not sure if it is complete or what the relation is, or the difference >>> between transducers and reducers ... >>> >>> >> >> >> >
