> On 10 Dec 2017, at 17:46, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote: > > Thanks Sven. Its interesting to trace that through to put other stuff I've > read about HMAC into perspective. > However SHA256 != SHA512 which is a defined requirement of the site I'm > accessing.
I was too quick. There is also http://www.samadhiweb.com/blog/2017.02.18.shacrypt.html I prefer code written in Pharo, but if you need real performance, then native code will be needed. Are you sure SHA512 is not in the Cryptography package ?
