A name like this would be clearer (although much more annoying):
returnAtLeast: minValue butNoMoreThan: maxValue
10 returnAtLeast: 12 butNoMoreThan: 48
Thanks,
cbc
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Hilaire <hila...@drgeo.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Out of curiosity.
>
> I always found the #min:max: confusing and lost in its expressiveness.
>
> One should write:
>
> 10 min: 48 max: 12
>
> to expect 12.
>
> but logically one (at least me) may want to express it as:
>
> 10 min: 12 max: 48
>
> Then when reading its source code, it is even more confusing:
>
> min: aMin max: aMax
> ^ (self min: aMin) max: aMax
>
> Are not the argument names inversed in their meaning, if any?
>
> Hilaire
>
> --
> Dr. Geo
> http://drgeo.eu
>
>
>
>
