On April 21, 2018 12:12:10 AM GMT+02:00, Chris Cunningham <cunningham...@gmail.com> wrote: >A name like this would be clearer (although much more annoying): > >returnAtLeast: minValue butNoMoreThan: maxValue > 10 returnAtLeast: 12 butNoMoreThan: 48
#beBetween:and: or #boundedBetween:and: >Thanks, >cbc > >On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Hilaire <hila...@drgeo.eu> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Out of curiosity. >> >> I always found the #min:max: confusing and lost in its >expressiveness. >> >> One should write: >> >> 10 min: 48 max: 12 >> >> to expect 12. >> >> but logically one (at least me) may want to express it as: >> >> 10 min: 12 max: 48 >> >> Then when reading its source code, it is even more confusing: >> >> min: aMin max: aMax >> ^ (self min: aMin) max: aMax >> >> Are not the argument names inversed in their meaning, if any? >> >> Hilaire >> >> -- >> Dr. Geo >> http://drgeo.eu >> >> >> >>
