Issue: https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/issues/1009
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:02 AM Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Aaand the mail got sent before :)
>
> Then two other comments that are related or I'd like to discuss:
> - So far we can allow in iceberg several projects with the same name.
> That is not a problem, so you can clone the same project from two different
> repositories. Of course this would mean that one will be dirty all the time
> (in comparison against the image).
> - I'd like to "rethink" the directory structure. We have chosen to use
> {owner}/{repository} for some time now, but that is only valid for those
> hostings that store repositories under a username (e.g.,
> github/gitlab/bitbucket) and is not valid for other kind of git
> hostings/server (e.g., a home gitolite).
> This makes that the directory where the repositories are, suddenly
> mixes different structures {owner}/{repository} and {repository}, and we
> pay that lack of coherence afterwards... But making a purely flat structure
> will cause much more name clashes. And there is some story with Metacello
> compatibility around it too!
> I'm just not sure what is the bestish solution here. Maybe what we
> have is good enough, but if somebody would like to prototype around this,
> I'd be glad to learn more about pros and cons ^^.
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:51 AM Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I agree with most of the comments here. I'll try to summarize:
>>
>> - we should be able to specify the name of a project independently of
>> their location/repository name
>> - Maybe, for old projects that don't have a name, we could initialize a
>> project's name as it's repository name?
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:07 AM Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to
>>> make a pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it’s not going to be me for a
>>> little while until I can find an Apple store on my travels.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tim Mackinnon wrote
>>>> > either by showing {owner}/{project}
>>>>
>>>> What about when there are multiple remotes?
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be
>>> auto-coded into the project name.
>>> Remote are well handled within Iceberg.
>>> The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project
>>> name i.e. "owner-project"
>>>
>>> cheers -ben
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Guille Polito
>>
>> Research Engineer
>>
>> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
>>
>> CRIStAL - UMR 9189
>>
>> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr
>> <http://www.cnrs.fr>*
>>
>>
>> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
>>
>> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Guille Polito
>
> Research Engineer
>
> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
>
> CRIStAL - UMR 9189
>
> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr
> <http://www.cnrs.fr>*
>
>
> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
>
> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
>
--
Guille Polito
Research Engineer
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189
French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr
<http://www.cnrs.fr>*
*Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
*Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
