On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 15:52, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> - Maybe, for old projects that don't have a name, we could initialize a
> project's name as it's repository name?
>
In any case, I'd expect the project name within Iceberg to match the name
of the working directory on disk.
Possibly even the project renamed within Iceberg should rename the disk
working directory.
(btw, I don't know if "project name" is the best term, but I can't think of
a better one.)
cheers -ben
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:07 AM Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to
>> make a pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it’s not going to be me for a
>> little while until I can find an Apple store on my travels.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Mackinnon wrote
>>> > either by showing {owner}/{project}
>>>
>>> What about when there are multiple remotes?
>>>
>>
>> +1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded
>> into the project name.
>> Remote are well handled within Iceberg.
>> The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project
>> name i.e. "owner-project"
>>
>> cheers -ben
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Guille Polito
>
> Research Engineer
>
> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
>
> CRIStAL - UMR 9189
>
> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr
> <http://www.cnrs.fr>*
>
>
> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
>
> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
>
