I don’t know if a 10 year lifespan is exceptional. I wrote an application in 
1986 that’s still running. Development took 6 weeks. Including testing.

/————————————————————/
For encrypted mail use jgpfers...@protonmail.com
Get a free account at ProtonMail.com
Web: www.objectnets.net and www.objectnets.org

> On Aug 6, 2019, at 04:37, horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Well, all software applications eventually meet their EOL. IRIS-2 had a good,
> long run.
> 
> Note that the same thing applies to JWARS. It was EOL'd in 2010, but it was
> operational for over a decade. That's pretty damn good!
> 
> None of this takes away from Smalltalk's efficacy and power.
> 
> 
> 
> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote
>> Yes. And I think it's even more sad than the containers example doesn't
>> work anymore... AFAIK they replaced the system.
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 05:06 Tim Mackinnon &lt;
> 
>> tim@
> 
>> &gt; wrote:
>> 
>>> It’s very entertaining but it seems a bit sad - it’s a shame it refers to
>>> JP-Morgan as “used Smalltalk “ as actually they are “still using
>>> Smalltalk”
>>> (so it’s not in the past)
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 5 Aug 2019, at 16:19, Richard Kenneth Eng &lt;
> 
>> horrido.hobbies@
> 
>> &gt;
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> A big fan of my work created this rogue video:
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1opveHaukFK8WbQ8wg8b14wuKJsjoOZfO/view
>>> 
>>> I appreciate the homage, but I can't take credit for it.
>>> 
>>> It's really quite beautiful, though. I'm using it as part of my
>>> evangelism.
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
> 

Reply via email to