Perhaps it has a problem in license of libxml2 and libxslt.
We may include it in etc, but it does not become the Boost license.
And I don't need such libraries for a *standard*.
--
SHOO
(2010/11/14 18:44), Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 15:35 +0900, SHOO wrote:
About a problem of std.xml.
Potentially n00b comment but . . .
The Python community seem to be giving up on having their own library
for processing XML and are using bindings to libxml2 and libxslt. Is it
likely that a D source XML library can do better than libxml2 and
libxslt or might it be better just to create a D idiomatic binding?
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
