A benchmark has shown that the Tango XML module is a lot faster than many of the XML libraries out there, specially than the Phobos module. So I would say that D could do better than other libraries at least when it comes to speed.
http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs-with-rapidxml/ On 14 nov 2010, at 10:44, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 15:35 +0900, SHOO wrote: >> About a problem of std.xml. > > Potentially n00b comment but . . . > > The Python community seem to be giving up on having their own library > for processing XML and are using bindings to libxml2 and libxslt. Is it > likely that a D source XML library can do better than libxml2 and > libxslt or might it be better just to create a D idiomatic binding? > > -- > Russel. > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos -- /Jacob Carlborg _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
