LOL! This is terrible!
The performance is not so important for me, but this report moves me to
tears.
What is a bottleneck?
--
SHOO
(2010/11/14 21:55), Jacob Carlborg wrote:
A benchmark has shown that the Tango XML module is a lot faster than many of
the XML libraries out there, specially than the Phobos module. So I would say
that D could do better than other libraries at least when it comes to speed.
http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs-with-rapidxml/
On 14 nov 2010, at 10:44, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 15:35 +0900, SHOO wrote:
About a problem of std.xml.
Potentially n00b comment but . . .
The Python community seem to be giving up on having their own library
for processing XML and are using bindings to libxml2 and libxslt. Is it
likely that a D source XML library can do better than libxml2 and
libxslt or might it be better just to create a D idiomatic binding?
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected]
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
