On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, jdow wrote: >Oh, some. It is sorta sad that this implies we'll see fewer and fewer >machines with multiple year uptimes that are not in rather positions >where machine security doesn't matter.
The uptime of a machine is a meaningless metric, in particular once kernel security erratum has been released (as you hint at above). Any machines running in a capacity where security doesn't matter, but uptime does, are typically going to be some kind of enterprise machine of some sort, and that is where Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES or Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS would be a better choice anyway IMHO. ;o) -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
