Someone at work talks about using robotic devices with real time linux kernels. I haven't tried out those kernel versions, but I was wondering if these versions were ever tried out for gaming and with the functionality and time critical process need to be real alternatives to the NT4, 5 and 5.1 alternatives.
You're kidding right?
There are at least 3 hard realtime linux solutions I can think of - this is used where you absolutely have to respond in 150 microseconds, not 500 or 850. The question is, could windows ever be a real alternative to realtime linux - from the way the embedded market is moving to linux, I think the answer is fairly clear....
As for gaming, a hard realtime linux kernel would probably be way overkill - the latency distribution of the 2.5 kernel will probably be more than good enough for the most hard core gamer....
Best Regards,
Joe
-- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
