It seems the changes are fundamental enough to merit a new major version number, if that is indeed the case -
It could be that 9.0 is meant to be "2.5-ready"
Joe
Kent Pirkle wrote:
It's on the main www.redhat.com page too.
I wonder why 9.0 instead of 8.1?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
From the Red Hat Linux 6.2/7.0 End of Life Reminder that I just received:
"And, as of 3/31, Red Hat Linux 9 will be available to Red Hat Network subscribers as well."
Since this came directly from Red Hat, I just might be inclined to believe it. Anyone care to confirm or deny?
- -- Matthew J. Brodeur RHCE, GSEC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.NextTime.com
"As you and I both know, the software may be free, but the beer isn't." -- Jon "maddog" Hall
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+f1rTc8/WFSz+GKMRAjsZAJsFDIOGxnyXMHe/x/s2oI2rRiKPdgCfWynN ZWY3rGaniU0QAh2ykwOM3wY= =YUBW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Phoebe-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
-- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
