Interesting thought....I just noticed, its not Red Hat Linux 9.0...its Red Hat Linux 9.
I wonder if there is a significance to that? > It seems the changes are fundamental enough > to merit a new major version number, if that is > indeed the case - > > It could be that 9.0 is meant to be "2.5-ready" > > Joe -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
