I'm curious if you have ever considered or evaluted Suse for server or work station use? I've been on RH since 6.2 but have been evaluating Suse 8.1 and have been impressed. Your opinion would be valuable to me based on your experience. Thanks Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 24 March 2003 6:14 pm, Andreas-Johann Ulvestad wrote: > I've been using Red Hat Linux since the early 3.x-days, and have tested > each single release since 4.0, and I must say that the hairs on my neck > have become a bit stiffer than usual after the release announcement of Red > Hat Linux 9. > > Red Hat Linux .0-releases have always been.. well... LOUSY. Sorry guys, > you've done an excellent job all these years, but it's a _well known_ fact > that you never ever run .0-releases. Almost everyone I know (including all > the customers the company I'm working for is operating) will have a > ..0-release running on a test system, but never ever run it on a > workstation or server. NEVER servers. > > Why? They are unstable, software is seldom available (binary compability > shite), during the next weeks and months, 200-600 megs with errata land, > etc etc, etc... it's just crazy to run a new Red Hat Linux release until a > ..1 is out, and you put servers on hold until a .2 og .3-release is out. -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
