On Wednesday 26 March 2003 16:37, Matthew Miller wrote: > For what it's worth, going from 12 to 18 months would do a lot to make > people happy. Or even 15. If releases continue come out every 6 months, > there's not much breathing room between a brand new release and "must > update right now", unless you plan on updating every nine months or so -- > and that's too fast for anything but experimental. A 15-month policy would > allow people to do yearly upgrades without feeling panicked near the end. > This is doubly true if the version-to-version volatility is going up -- > there's not much room to wait a few months after a release before > installing it on all systems.
Well said Matt. I wish I had held my response since we seem to be saying the same thing. -- Gene -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
