Hi Chris,
Yes, that's right. There was no shaping of the end of the wire on
Victor Tungstones. I just confirmed that by looking at a couple of NOS
Tungstones that I have. The wire was sheared to essentially a flat end
shape. Victor advised playing a junk record first to shape the end of the
wire before using a new needle to play good records. Likewise, Victor
advised reshaping the needle by playing a junk record if the user ever
removed the needle and then remounted it in the reproducer. The wire wears
into the shape of the groove in just a minute or so of play, so the initial
shape of it is irrelevant.
I failed to comment earlier specifically on the claim that osmium and other
hard needles could be removed and remounted without a problem. This is NOT
correct, for the same reason that Victor advised reshaping their tungsten
needles if they were remounted. The needle tip wears into the "V" shape of
the groove fairly quickly, depending on the hardness of the needle.
Remounting the needle with exactly the same orientation as when it was
removed is almost impossible. After remounting, there is a very high
probability that the misoriented needle will severely gouge the record for a
while until it is reformed to fit the groove, the moreso with the harder
needles. This is not so much of a problem with the tungsten wire needles as
they can be reformed in only about a minute of play with a junk record.
Greg Bogantz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Kocsis" <chris...@cox.net>
To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l@oldcrank.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Coin machine or jukebox needles?
Thank you, Greg!
Are you saying that tungsten wire shaped needles are just clipped lengths
of tungsten wire, without a point being formed on them before being used
to play a record?
Chris
Greg Bogantz wrote:
Osmium tipped needles were a transitional style. They were the
cheapest "permanent" needle typically marketed in the late 1930s thru the
'50s. The more expensive varieties of "permanent" needles were sapphire
or ruby and the most expensive were diamond. People were using record
changers and didn't want to mess around with changing steel needles all
the time, so these styles became popular. The problem with all of these
needles in that time period is that the pickups tracked at too high a
force for any of them to be optimal with regard to record wear. The
magnetic and crystal pickups of that period typically tracked at between
30 and 80 grams. Although that's less than the 80 to 150 grams of the
earlier acoustic reproducer period, it's still just too high for any of
these hard needles. They were especially deadly when used with the early
vinyl 78s that were beginning to appear after WWII. The proper
technology for high tracking forces was the steel or tungsten wire needle
when used with shellac records that contained abrasive fillers that were
intended to quickly wear the needle into conformance with the groove
shape. But, of course, the steel needles needed to be changed with every
record side or two. Tungsten WIRE shaped needles are superior to the
osmium tipped needles because the cylindrical wire shape retains the same
cross-sectional area during the entire lifetime of the needle. The
osmium needles were tapered and as they wore they got a bigger cross
section. This is fine until the cross section gets too big to fit into
the groove width which happens after just a few records are played. Then
the needle forms shoulders that ride outside the groove and on the land
of the record. This lifts the needle out of close contact with the
groove walls which leads to mistracking, distortion, and high record
wear. These hard needles, especially the sapphire and diamond ones don't
wear down quickly, and instead wear the records. These needles that were
typical in this time period are the main reason that records that have
survived from the '30s thru the '50s look worn and sound more distorted
and worn than records that have survived from the teens and '20s and that
were played properly with steel or tungsten wire needles. The use of
these hard needles only became proper when pickup tracking forces were
reduced to 10 grams or less in the 1950s. I don't feel comfortable using
them even above about 5 grams. Tracking forces of 1 to 2 grams became
commonplace in the early 1960s, and jewel-tipped needles are perfectly
satisfactory when used in these pickups.
The bottom line is, I would NOT recommend using hard needles in any
pickup tracking at more than 10 grams if you want to preserve your
records. When new, these needles will sound good for a while. But they
will be grinding the bejeezus out of your records if you are tracking
them at 30 grams or more. If you have a jukebox or record changer that
operates at high tracking force, use tungsten wire needles. Or change
the pickup (and tonearm if necessary) to allow tracking forces below 10
grams if you want to use jewel-tipped needles. Osmium would also work in
this application, but it will wear out after 20 sides or so, even at this
tracking force. Osmium is just a bad idea for just about any
application.
Greg Bogantz
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Kocsis" <chris...@cox.net>
To: <phono-l@oldcrank.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:47 PM
Subject: [Phono-L] Coin machine or jukebox needles?
Can anyone give me the lowdown on jukebox needles? I bought some new
old stock Cole's coin machine needles with osmium tips. The package
says the needle lasts many plays and doesn't have to be rotated. I'm
also curious about the shape of the needle. A couple of millimeters up
from the point, the metal is flattened into a pointed oval like a cobra
head and then resumes being cylindrical. What is that for?
Osmium is nearly as hard as tungsten and I've seen some references to
people cutting their own needles from tungsten wire and forming the
point by rubbing the cut end in a record groove while rotating it (which
seems astonishing).
Is such hardness a good idea in a needle, or does it cause excessive
record wear?
If these jukebox needles are safe to use, how do I tell when it's time
to change one?
Best regards,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org