Wonder if its the Bell name for the California Ramblers.. -----Original Message----- From: bruce78...@comcast.net Sender: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:44:27 To: Antique Phonograph List<phono-l@oldcrank.org> Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l@oldcrank.org> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston Record on eBay
http :// www . youtube .com/watch?v=m6dk9s3_3s4 I have had this version on Bell for quite some time, but I can't find any information on the Hollywood Ramblers, could this be a pseudonym for another more recognizable band ? Bruce ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Zucca " < rochrest @ gmail .com> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l@ oldcrank .org> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:19:58 PM Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston Record on eBay Personally, I never liked the Whiteman version because of the lame try at scat singing. I understand that there is a Whiteman version without vocal, but I have never heard it. Grnmountain Bill On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:38 PM, <john9ten@ pacbell .net> wrote: > I still have a copy of the Whiteman version but I am not that impressed by > it. I might sell it too. > John > ------Original Message------ > From: jimcip @ earthlink .net > Sender: phono-l-bounces@ oldcrank .org > To: phonolist > ReplyTo : phonolist > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston Record on eBay > Sent: Jan 19, 2011 11:18 AM > > My favorite record of "The Charleston" is that by the Golden Gate Orchestra > on Edison diamond disc - Adrian Rollini's bass sax solo is marvelous. > > Jim Cartwright > Immortal Performances, Inc. > > jimcip @ earthlink .net > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Douglas Houston <cdh041@ earthlink .net> > > To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l@ oldcrank .org> > > Date: 19-Jan-2011 12:43:43 PM > > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston Record on eBay > > > > I missed a lot of the messages about the Charleston record. was really > > cxurious , too. Could somebody fill me in on which performance/artist (and > > possibly label) that was? I've had one on Brunswick for a long time, and > > feel that it must be about as authentic an arrangement as ever there was. > > Nice record. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: <john9ten@ pacbell .net> > > > To: phonolist <phono-l@ oldcrank .org> > > > Date: 1/18/2011 11:32:30 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston Record on eBay > > > > > > Yeah, I was expecting maybe $40 to $50... > > > ------Original Message------ > > > From: Vinyl Visions > > > Sender: phono-l-bounces@ oldcrank .org > > > To: phonolist > > > ReplyTo : phonolist > > > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston Record on eBay > > > Sent: Jan 18, 2011 7:25 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey John, congratulations - that was a home run... > > > Curt > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Phono-L mailing list > > > http ://phono-l. oldcrank .org > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Phono-L mailing list > > > http ://phono-l. oldcrank .org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Phono-L mailing list > > http ://phono-l. oldcrank .org > > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http ://phono-l. oldcrank .org > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http ://phono-l. oldcrank .org > _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http ://phono-l. oldcrank .org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
