I highly doubt that..I'll ask my friend Dick Carty, he's a Billy Murray expert and would probably know.
________________________________ From: William Zucca <rochr...@gmail.com> To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l@oldcrank.org> Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011 4:48:29 PM Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O Well, a friend once told me that it was actually BILLY MURRAY, but I can't verify this. Thank you very much for the chance to hear the non-vocal version. What is the source of that recording? Did Victor release this alternate take under the same catalog number? GrnMountainBill On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:32 PM, DanKj <ediso...@verizon.net> wrote: > The same voice made a four syllable reappearance on "Charlestonette", 4 > months later. I assume he was a band member. > > Here's Charleston, take 5, which has no vocal effects. There are a couple > of overmodulated moments, so maybe that's why this take wasn't used. > > http://www.box.net/shared/m8niz5c5ml > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: <john9...@pacbell.net> > > > Yeah that is actually funny! >> -----Original Message----- >> From: William Zucca <rochr...@gmail.com> >> >> Personally, I never liked the Whiteman version because of the lame try at >> scat singing. I understand that there is a Whiteman version without >> vocal, >> but I have never heard it. >> >> Grnmountain Bill >> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:38 PM, <john9...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> I still have a copy of the Whiteman version but I am not that impressed by >>> it. I might sell it too. >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org