Well, a friend once told me that it was actually BILLY MURRAY, but I can't
verify this.

Thank you very much for the chance to hear the non-vocal version.  What is
the source of that recording?  Did Victor release this alternate take under
the same catalog number?

GrnMountainBill

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:32 PM, DanKj <ediso...@verizon.net> wrote:

> The same voice made a four syllable reappearance on "Charlestonette", 4
> months later. I assume he was a band member.
>
> Here's Charleston, take 5, which has no vocal effects.  There are a couple
> of overmodulated moments, so maybe that's why this take wasn't used.
>
> http://www.box.net/shared/m8niz5c5ml
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <john9...@pacbell.net>
>
>
> Yeah that is actually funny!
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: William Zucca <rochr...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Personally, I never liked the Whiteman version because of the lame try at
>> scat singing.  I understand that there is a Whiteman version without
>> vocal,
>> but I have never heard it.
>>
>> Grnmountain Bill
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:38 PM, <john9...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>> I still have a copy of the Whiteman version but I am not that impressed by
>>> it. I might sell it too.
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to