Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest commit -- depreciation of call_user_method()

[Rasmus Lerdorf]

> >I really don't think that this should be something to strive for.  There
> >should be a really really good reason for making changes that break
> >backward compatibility.  We have that second version number reserved for
> >such BC breaking changes that don't involve a huge rewrite (which is what
> >the first version number is for).  And yes, we have been very afraid to
> >make such changes, as we should be!  And the fact that we have never had a
> >.1 is an indication of just how unwilling we have been to make such
> >changes.  I see this as a success and not as a failure.  Imagine writing a
>
> I don't agree. Have you noticed the thread about domxml currently running
> in php-dev@? Wouldn't that justify a 4.1? What would?

No, I don't think a single extension should affect the PHP version number
to that extent.  But I do think we should be moving towards versioning the
extensions individually.

-Rasmus


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]