> -----Original Message-----
> From: sterling hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:49 PM
> To: Lukas Beeler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] About ext/sockets/
>
>
> On 24 Jun 2001 21:40:19 +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jani Taskinen
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:11 PM
> > > To: Daniel Beulshausen
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About ext/sockets/
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Daniel Beulshausen wrote:
> > >
> > > >the issue that made the extension break was the step from
> > > resources to
> > > >longs for the socket fd's, this was necessary as win32
> > > socket fd's are
> > > >different from bsd style socket fd's.
> > >
> > > So this is broken now only on *nix? Nice.
> > > Previously it worked only on unices, now it works only on win32?
> > > What an improvement.
> > it isn't broken, i've just compiled the latest cvs, and the
> > "new" sockets example script performed well, also with using
> > pcntl to fork the "servers"
> >
>
> well, it depends what you consider broken, when the extension was
> commited, parts of it (*nix) were accessing integers like they were
> structures... I've gone through the source code and will be committing
> improvements, today or tommorow (i hope), there are a few functions
> which are "broken".
>
> -Sterling
of course it always depends on how you define broken
as already said, i would classify it "experimental" and leave the "old"
sockets extension
as it is in upcoming releases till completion of the "new" sockets
extension
Lukas Beeler
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
